Rachel Nabors ([info]crowhen) wrote,
@ 2008-01-22 17:10:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Blog for Choice Day
Blog for Choice Day

My generation takes a lot of things for granted. We have forgotten a time when a woman could only find work in a few fields, when she could be ruined on the whim of a man, when her life was forfeit to her husband or the church. We don't remember a time when we could not vote, when we were to be seen only and never heard.

I'm surprised at how nonchalant my generation is about women's rights and equality, especially considering how far we have to go. We have a woman running for president, yet we are not excited. We have drunk girls stripping on camera for the profit of lewd entertainment vultures, yet we are not outraged. We are paid seventy-five cents to every dollar a man earns, yet we are not on strike. Now our rights to our own bodies are challenged, yet not enough of us are concerned.

I sometimes think about how hard women fought, not just in the sixties and seventies, but a hundred years before. And now our hard-won rights are assaulted on all fronts. Our foremothers won these rights for us for a reason, and now more than ever, we need them.

Until girls in school are given free birth control as soon as they come of age, I believe in choice. Until at age eighteen a woman can elect to undergo tubal ligation, I believe in choice. Until birth control is 100% effective, I believe in choice. Until incest is wiped out, I believe in choice. Until rape is nonexistent, I believe in choice.

To condemn a woman to pregnancy when she is not ready is offensive to the gifts of humanity, the things that separate us from the rest of the animals. I know too many who have ruined both their own lives and the lives of their children by accidental pregnancy too early or too often.

Abortion is never easy or pleasant, and I know no one who has had one and not been deeply hurt by the experience. But how different their lives would have been if they had not the bravery to make this choice, the biggest and most important choice a woman can make. It is a grim decision to make, but it is still our decision. We could no sooner give up this right than allow our country to decide when we could not have children.

And mind you, having your reproductive rights removed at birth would be easy. Then you would have to show that you were fit to reproduce to have the effects reversed later in life. If your heart cries out at such an injustice, than I assure you, it is only the opposite extreme. Value your freedom to make the best life you can for you and your family. Fight for it. It cost us so much to earn it.

I realize that by posting this I could totally lose a job in my future if I'm applying to work for a company with a different viewpoint. However, this is a democracy, and the only way it works is if we communicate with each other and our government. By speaking out, I am exercising my rights and being a good American citizen.

My friend Leigh has also posted about it.

Blogged with Flock




(Post a new comment)


[info]ldragoon
2008-01-22 10:12 pm UTC (link)
W00T! Go, Rachel, go! Shake that bitchy pen!

(Reply to this)


[info]moon_lit_night
2008-01-23 12:20 am UTC (link)
I agree completely. Great post.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]crowhen
2008-01-23 12:22 am UTC (link)
Thanks!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2008-01-23 12:33 am UTC (link)
http://yaledailynews.com/articles/view/23045

I thought this might interest you.

(Reply to this)


[info]j_u_d_a_s
2008-01-23 01:31 am UTC (link)
>I realize that by posting this I could totally lose a job in my future if I'm applying to work for a company with a different viewpoint.

For real??? When I was in the US quite some years ago now, I was shocked at how intrusive your work can be. Random drug tests, plus I remember the automated application terminal psychoanalysis tests at Blockbuster video too. But now your political views can affect where you work? As a clueless Englander, I'm blown away.

There was a growing pro-life feeling in the UK recently. Thankfully common sense seems to have won out but it's frightening knowing that even in the 21st century that people should even want to oppose a womans right to choose!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]crowhen
2008-01-23 01:54 am UTC (link)
Because so many people in the states are conservative and online background checks are more and more regular, it has happened in the past that people have been laid off for expressing their views online or not offered a job period. But I would like to think that I will work for people with open minds and reasoning skills.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]j_u_d_a_s
2008-01-23 02:00 am UTC (link)
What kind of jobs do background checks? Would it be like say retail jobs in Safeways,Wal-Mart, big chains etc?
The only time I've heard about someone losing their job over their online rants has been when a Nintendo employee bitched about her co-workers. I just thought that was an isolated case of non proffessionalism (on her part). Over here, the only background checks are usually criminal records. It genuinely shocks me to think that you could be denied employment because you spoke out in favour of pro-choice.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]crowhen
2008-01-23 02:19 am UTC (link)
It's not hard for an employer to check out your website and read your blog. Heck, in graphic design it's a given! But some people liken abortion to murder and would as soon hire a pro-choicer as a murderer, I suppose.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]j_u_d_a_s
2008-01-23 02:36 am UTC (link)
Better get handy with those friends filters I guess. The only time I've had my work affected by my views was when I called my boss a lazy wanker. Silly me!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]crowhen
2008-01-23 02:37 am UTC (link)
But the point is that I want my readers to see this blog and think about it. If I friends-only this, it's preaching to the choir!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]j_u_d_a_s
2008-01-23 02:42 am UTC (link)
Yeah, sorry I meant that as a generalisation and not a reference to this particular entry.

For what it's worth, if I was ever in the position to hire/fire people, I'd be more impressed that you have your own views and opinions and can stand behind them. And you have my full support, not only as an artist but as someone trying to educate others as well through your work.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]atallvlad
2008-01-23 01:46 am UTC (link)
Well- by living in the United States we are by choice living in a backwards society in many ways anyway. True we were progressive in the past, but it seems to me that conservatism has been winning out over any progress in rights for maybe the past 20+ years now. My girlfriend is lithuanian and says she just cant understand how backwards thinking so many americans seem to be on healthcare , women's rights, evolution and other things she takes for granted in Europe.

I agree with Crowhen though. I'll even add to it. Why can't men be mandatorily sterilized at birth or maybe even after puberty with the VASclip? it doesn't hurt much and can be easily reversed. I've known more than a few women whom any kind of the different versions of the "pill" affects their mental and physical well- being very adversely. A little plastic clip inside a man doesnt hardly affect a man at all but for some reason this society insists on the woman taking the preventative measures. Other than condoms that is.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]crowhen
2008-01-23 01:52 am UTC (link)
America used to lead the way in thinking and science. Seems we're actually regressing while the rest of the world pushes forward.

And that's an excellent suggestion about the Vasclip. I have been on birth control, and it horribly messes up my system. If we did this to teenage boys, it would prevent them from siring children when they aren't ready, hoorah! However, teenage girls would still be at risk from males old enough to have the procedure reversed. It would really help fight against teen pregnancy, though.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2008-01-23 05:02 am UTC (link)
Choice is wonderful (http://www.priestsforlife.org/resources/abortionimages/22week/01_22.jpg)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]crowhen
2008-01-23 05:33 am UTC (link)
And I'm sure life is all it's cracked up to be.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]ldragoon
2008-01-31 07:40 pm UTC (link)
I guess compassion for other human beings is beyond some people. After all, it's much easier to care about perfect snowflake babies than real live human women. The snowflake babies don't talk and have no opinions, so you can project whatever you like onto them!

Edited at 2008-01-31 07:45 pm UTC

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]chasecorbeau
2008-01-23 08:49 am UTC (link)
I'm happy that a woman is running for president, and that it's been proven that a woman is a viable candidate. However, I'm not going to vote for someone just because she has the same naughty bits as me. That's as prejudiced as a man not voting for a woman because he thinks ill of women. I'm going to vote for someone because I like them as a person.

I'm all for removing people's naughty bits at birth, or at least their capacity to reproduce. They can keep the fun bits. I know too many morons with children. Meanwhile the educated people don't reproduce. That's why we're getting dumber as a species.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]crowhen
2008-01-23 09:23 am UTC (link)
That's a pretty prejudiced outlook, too, I fear. Plenty of smart people come from humble, uneducated backgrounds. My main concern is overpopulation. There aren't enough resources to support humans indefinitely, so we should be using more care than ever, as children we are having now won't have a very happy planet to live on when we die. Plus, abortion is a pretty horrible thing to go through, no matter what your age. If women (or men) were sterile until we chose to reproduce, we wouldn't have to undergo such torment.

I guess I'm more pro-sterilization and then pro-choice. One solves the other.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

thankyou
[info]rainfaced
2008-01-26 11:08 pm UTC (link)
Thanks for this. I frequently get looked at like I'm a murderer when I tell people I'm pro-choice. What they don't understand is that NO ONE is pro-abortion. We just don't believe that anyone should tell a woman what to do with her body, and what the rest of her life is going to be like.
That someone wouldn't hire you because of your opinion is a horrible reality.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: thankyou
[info]crowhen
2008-01-27 04:54 pm UTC (link)
For me it's not just about her body. It's about that child's future and her future children's future. Parenthood is a big responsibility, and I know that a teenager with no job and no real-world experience to mature her makes a less than ideal mother. Sure you hear the wonder stories of the Girl who Made It In Spite of Everything and the Girl Who Managed to Give up Her Child for Adoption (with the sequel "Girl Who Was Depressed and Regretful for Years"), but it RARELY WORKS OUT SO WELL.

All of the teen moms I knew in rural Virginia WERE NOT READY, and their children were severely shortchanged. They were not loved as well, cared for as well, anything. Their mothers loved them and wouldn't ever give them up, but truly it was children raising children in poverty and squalor.

Maybe if we could get rid of poverty and ignorance first, I would not be so vehement about this, but a lot of America is in no place to be getting pregnant,but for lack of birth control or self control, the ARE. And it IS a crisis, bot h for the mothers AND their born and unborn children.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: thankyou
[info]rainfaced
2008-01-27 07:58 pm UTC (link)
I agree. Even if the mother keeps the baby, if she's young there can be serious injury to her health and the baby's, plus all the well explained economic, career, and time challenges.

Not everyone can have the Juno experience, but I also have to think about one of my best friends, whose mother was pregnant with her when she was fourteen. If her mom had decided to get an abortion, I would never have known her. But that would've been her mom's choice, & I think I could respect that.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: thankyou
[info]crowhen
2008-01-27 10:40 pm UTC (link)
And if Hitler's mom had only had an abortion... Life is a series of choices. People micromanaging a woman's body and future are playing God just as much as a woman going to an abortion clinic.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Talk about choice...
(Anonymous)
2008-01-27 05:57 am UTC (link)
In the workplace, why is it that a male boss can be an arrogant pig but overlooked, yet a female boss in the same position is labelled "Bitchy"?

Why is it that in some countries, women are forced to totally cover themselves with garments or are otherwise eligible for rape?

Why is it that when a man sleeps with dozens of women, he is congratulated but a woman in the same position is labelled a “slut”?

Why are all Australian sports reporters male?

Why is it that male news journalists can retire from their job at a ripe old age when female journalists are pressured to stay young or be fired?

Why don’t men care?

Neither gender is more superior to the other and we all have something we can contribute to society. The sooner sexist men realise that, the better off we’ll all be.
>>I’d like to note that I don’t believe ALL men are sexist, just enough to make it obvious that gender equality has never existed.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…